November 02, 2007

Obama pitches youth, technology at Google gathering

Illinois Sen. Barack Obama, buoyed by new polls and what his campaign sees as growing momentum, highlighted his claim as the generational "change candidate" of the 2008 presidential race on Wednesday by telling a youthful crowd at Google Inc. that " if I waited 10 years (to run), I'd still be younger than most of the other candidates."

"So much is at stake that running for president can't be about just ambition this time," he told an audience of about 1,000 packed into an auditorium at Google's Mountain View campus.

"We have seen a gridlock where 45 percent of the country is on one side, 45 percent of the country is on the other ... (and) political contests just become beating down the other side and eking out a victory. And you can't govern," said the 46-year-old first-term senator.

Obama has criticized Democratic front-runner Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton of New York as a member of the Washington establishment that has helped create political stalemate on issues from immigration to health care. He continued that theme Wednesday without naming her, saying, "Washington has been governed by ... who's got the most juice, who's got the most clout - and that has to change."

Obama is the latest 2008 presidential candidate to use Google as a backdrop for a high-tech town hall. Unlike the traditional, more predictable such gatherings in the small, early contest states of Iowa and New Hampshire, candidates at Google face a young crowd armed with detailed, sometimes quirky questions.

Democrats Clinton, former North Carolina Sen. John Edwards and New Mexico Gov. Bill Richardson and Republicans Sen. John McCain of Arizona and Texas Rep. Ron Paul visited Google earlier this year, though Obama's crowd was the largest and most vocally supportive to date.

Obama used his Silicon Valley visit Wednesday - presided over by Google Chief Executive Officer Eric Schmidt with the company's founders Sergey Brin and Larry Page in the audience - to promote his five-point "innovation agenda." He also appeared Wednesday night at a rally at San Francisco's Bill Graham Civic Auditorium.

In little more than 24 hours in the Bay Area, the Illinois senator also hit four major fundraisers: two Tuesday events in San Francisco, a Wednesday morning stop in Marin County, and - prior to his Civic Center rally - a party for 300 supporters, most of whom donated the maximum $2,300 to the primary and general election campaign, in the Atherton home of former state Controller Steve Westly, a high-tech investor and major Obama fundraiser.

Obama answered questions at Google about the war in Iraq and his policy views toward Iran, and addressed what he termed key differences between himself and his Democratic rivals.

While he said he appreciated President Bill Clinton's ultimately unsuccessful effort at health care reform in 1993, Obama said his work on the issue will be open rather than developed behind closed doors. He pledged to have "a big table" with consumers, unions, health care providers and pharmaceutical firms weighing in to find solutions to the issues of rising health care costs and growing numbers of uninsured.

The senator said his effort to reach a health care reform plan would be so open "it will all be on C-SPAN." And if attack ads from opponents start, as they did during Clinton's failed effort, "I'll send out something on YouTube," he said to cheers from the crowd at Google, which owns YouTube. "And (I'll) let them know what the facts are."

Making deft use of a question about what he has learned from the political successes of former President Clinton, who is tremendously popular among Democrats, Obama appeared to use the moment to dig, however gently, at the style of the former first lady.

"One of the things Bill Clinton did was to recognize the moment," he said. "He came in and he said, 'You know what, I'm a different kind of Democrat and I'm willing to do things in new ways.' "

Now, "we are in this defining moment and we can't keep doing the same things that we have been doing, but haven't been working," he said. "Democrats lose when they are not clear about what they stand for. Democrats lose when they are attacked, and - because they don't know where they stand - they end up getting defensive instead of going on the offensive."

Obama campaign insiders said Wednesday that recent polls and events in the campaign such as the senator's well-received speech last weekend in Iowa have created a shift that has electrified his supporters - and boosted his fundraising with everyone pointing toward the opening contest of the nominating campaign Jan. 3 in Iowa.

"The rock star stuff is back," said Obama's California campaign director Mitchell Schwartz. "We have the wind at our back ... and it's a different ballgame."

"It was hard to raise money a month ago," said Westly, noting that the media was talking up Hillary Clinton's "inevitability" and the New York senator appeared to be making a flawless run toward the Democratic Party's presidential nomination.

But after Clinton stumbled recently in a debate over the issue of illegal immigration, and Obama's speech at the Jefferson-Jackson Dinner in Iowa, "it's been the easiest thing I've ever raised money for," Westly said.

Obama, Clinton and Edwards are tightly bunched in public opinion polls of Iowa Democrats and Obama has almost halved Clinton's once 20-point lead in polls of expected primary voters in New Hampshire, the second major contest.

Westly said Clinton has increasingly appeared "off her balance," while Edwards has gone on a sharp attack and Obama has remained "the statesman." Just as voters are beginning to take a look at the White House race in earnest, they are seeing Obama as "the candidate of change," he said

Obama's decision, however, to tout his "innovation agenda" at Google on Wednesday repeated many of the technology friendly proposals made earlier by the other Democratic candidates.

Clinton, appearing before the Silicon Valley Leadership Group in June, also proposed an "innovation agenda" including a $50 billion strategic energy fund to develop research on global warming - a proposal similar to Obama's call for $50 billion in federal funds for a "clean technology" venture capital fund.

Edwards, too, had used events in Silicon Valley to call for increasing the number of H-1B visas for highly trained technical foreign workers, more government support of broadband access and extension of research and development tax credits.

On Wednesday, Obama proposed creating a national "chief technology officer" position charged with making government more transparent and accessible to citizens on the Internet. The senator also proposed a "Google for Government" effort which he said would provide more Web accessibility to government records, and called for live feeds and Webcasts of government meetings and public commentary on its work via the Internet.

That proposal isn't groundbreaking in government: For example, California's Republican Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger has offered live feeds and Webcasts of many of his events for years.

Source: www.sfgate.com 

Comments :

Stinger

November 15, 2007 at 16:40

Until I see otherwise the only real candidate for change is Ron Paul. Like Ross Perot, he probably won't win, but at least he stands for something. I'm a conservative by nature, but Bush's stance on immigration has soured me to the republicans. Obama is no different than Hillary or most of the republicans. He will pander to special interests, spend vast amounts of US treasure to defend the lazy, backstabbing Euros who refuse to defend their own interests themselves and basically screw things up by tinkering. I'm still not 100% sure I'll vote for Ron Paul as it could be a situation like 1991 where Perot took enough votes away from Bush I to allow Clinton to win. Normally that would be livable, but in this day and age Clinton 2 in the form of Hillary would be a disaster. Besides like someone else mentioned, If Hillary is elected we'll have lived under the rule of 2 families-Bush and Clintons. That sounds like a monarchy to me.

toniosf

November 15, 2007 at 16:40

ok, let's see how many comments before someone with a neocon-neonazi mentality starts bashing Obama

sandman

November 15, 2007 at 16:41

hey, i'm a computer guy and Google does not represent me. their hiring practices are so constrained (youth only, only certain universities, demonstrated willingness to drink the cool-aid group-think) that if a candidate appeals to them, it makes sense to show up and rake in some cash from each of the clones. if the money was over at Jubilee, that's where Barack would have gone.

California

November 15, 2007 at 16:41

Obama and Edwards are going to help the American people by giving Google help replacing Americans with H-1Bs. See Lou Dobbs report at http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0711/13/ldt.01.html Samples: The study shows that between 1985 and 2000 435,000 U.S. citizens and permanent residents a year graduated with Bachelors, Masters, and Doctoral degrees in Science and Engineering. That's three times the number of jobs in Science and Engineering added per year, 150,000 during that time. Now Lou, that's the Urban Institute, the Alfred P. Sloan (ph) Foundation, Duke, Harvard, the RAND Corporation. Studies done independently of each other, different researches, different funding, all reaching the same basic conclusion that there is no worker shortage. Lou, the problem is not a lack of workers. The problem these studies all conclude is a lack of companies hiring them. The H-1B is cheap replacement labor.

robin

November 15, 2007 at 16:42

Obama may ultimately get shot by some gonzo white supremo from the south so his running mate is of the utmost importance. White and southern. A no brainer. Swamp trash Clinton is a carpet bagging gold digger who shouldnt be allowed to serve coffee at her own fund raisers let alone run the country. Neither is great but somebody has to win and everyone else loses. After what the Republican party has done over the past 7 years there is zero chance they could get any candidate elected to the big house - so - the responsibility is on the Obama team to make this a no brainer for the "red states." Gore? Edwards? The discussion should be who will/would they choose as as running mate and get that out in the open now. It will tell a larger tale about the next 4 and possibly 8 years of our country. Gore as a VP (again) seals the victory for Obama. Then he gets his own shot at the top dog position for another 8.

donkey

November 15, 2007 at 16:42

Doesn't anyone think to compare Arnie's experience level with Barack's? I've always been a democrat, but I gotta say Arnie has been a better governator than i expected, and as for prior experience? Geez...

If you don't see one of your comments, that's mean that it is not moderated yet or it has been rejected.

Add a comment :

On Publikr-demo.com, you can express your opinion about all the contents.

This section is moderated. The texts will be published after editor approbation. Publikr-demo.com reserves itself the rights to reject any comments at any time.